Public Engagement
ßÏßÏÊÓƵ Neuroscience public engagement activities
We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We'd like to set additional cookies to understand how you use our site so we can improve it for everyone. Also, we'd like to serve you some cookies set by other services to show you relevant content.
View our privacy policy.ßÏßÏÊÓƵ Neuroscience public engagement activities
Local contacts and activities
News from the Open Research Technologies Hub
By: Stephanie Allen
Last updated: Tuesday, 15 June 2021
A team of neuroscientists are calling for greater support of neuroscience research in Africa following a long-term analysis of research outputs in the continent.
The findings detail important information about funding and international collaboration comparing activity in the continent to the US, UK and areas of Europe. It’s hoped that the study will provide useful data to help shape and grow science in Africa.
Africa has the world’s largest human genetic diversity which carries important implications for understanding human diseases, including neurological disorders.
Co-lead Senior author , Professor of Neuroscience in the School of Life Sciences and the ßÏßÏÊÓƵ Neuroscience research group at the ßÏßÏÊÓƵ said: "One beautiful thing about science is that there is no such thing as a truly local problem. But that also means that there should be no such thing as a local solution - research and scientific communication by their very nature must be a global endeavour.
“And yet, currently the vast majority of research across most disciplines is carried out by a relatively small number of countries, located mostly in the global north. This is a huge waste of human potential."
The team, made up of experts from the ßÏßÏÊÓƵ, the Francis Crick Institute and institutions from across Africa, analysed all of the continent’s Neuroscience outputs over two decades, thoroughly curating local and international collaborations, research citation, visibility and funding.
Lead author , a Research Fellow in the School of Life Sciences and the ßÏßÏÊÓƵ Neuroscience research group at the ßÏßÏÊÓƵ and visiting scientist at Yobe State University, Nigeria, said: “Even though early progress in neuroscience began in Egypt, Africa’s research in this area has not kept pace with developments in the field around the world. There are a number of reasons behind this and, for the first time, our work has provided a clear picture of why – covering both strengths and weaknesses of neuroscience research in Africa and comparing this to other continents.
“We hope it will provide useful data to guide governments, funders and other stakeholders in helping to shape science in Africa, and combat the ‘brain drain’ from the region.”
Co-lead Senior author , a Group Leader at the Francis Crick Institute, said: “One of the reasons why this work is so important, is that the first step to solve any problem is understanding it. Here we analyse key features and the evolution of neuroscience publications across all 54 African countries, and put them in a global context. This highlights strengths and weaknesses, and informs which aspects will be key in the future to support the growth and global integration of neuroscience research in the continent.” 
The study, published in , clearly details the African countries with the highest research outputs and reveals that the majority of research funding comes from external sources such as the USA and UK.
The researchers argue that local funding is vital in order to establish a sustainable African neuroscience research environment, suggesting greater government backing as well as support from the philanthropic sector.
Professor Baden added: "One pervasive problem highlighted in our research was the marked absence of domestic funding. In most African countries, international funding far predominates. This is doubly problematic.
“Firstly, it takes away the crucial funding stability that African researchers would need to meaningfully embark on large-scale and long-term research projects, and secondly, it means that the international, non-African funders essentially end up deciding what research is performed across the continent. Such as system would generate profound outrage across places like Europe - how then can it be acceptable for Africa?"
Many of the researchers involved in the analysis are active members of , a charity co-founded by Lucia and Tom, which supports scientific capacity building across Africa through biomedical training courses, networking opportunities, outreach and workshops.